Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [BETA] Crazy Odyssey: A New Journey

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 3,917 concurrent players against 215, a 18.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 4,527. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +3.8% week over week versus -55.9% for [BETA] Crazy Odyssey: A New Journey. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.9M vs 4.8M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and [BETA] Crazy Odyssey: A New Journey is charted above.

Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
3,917
playing now
6,794 24h peak · 268.9M visits
VS
[BETA] Crazy Odyssey: A New Journey
215
playing now
1,438 24h peak · 4.8M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING][BETA] Crazy Odyssey: A New Journey

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] [BETA] Crazy Odyssey: A New JourneyDifference
Playing now3,9172153,702 (18.2×)
24h peak6,7941,4385,356 (4.7×)
24h average4,9416484,293 (7.6×)
7-day peak6,7942,8463,948 (2.4×)
7-day average4,9499583,991 (5.2×)
30-day peak6,7942,8463,948 (2.4×)
All-time peak7,7294,5273,202 (1.7×)
24h change 0.4% 39.6%
7d change 3.8% 55.9%
Total visits268.9M4.8M264.1M (55.7×)
Visits (24h)472.1K71.7K400.4K (6.6×)
Visits (7d)3.2M670.1K2.5M (4.7×)
Favorites5.6M7.5K5.6M (745.1×)
Rating96.5%87.5%
Global rank (players)#362#2,813of 8,339
Trending score-0.6-88.9
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jul 3, 2026
GenreSurvivalRPG

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 14 for [BETA] Crazy Odyssey: A New Journey.