Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Dungeon Hunters [UPD]

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 3,917 concurrent players against 1,476, a 2.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 3,170. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +3.8% week over week versus -1.2% for Dungeon Hunters [UPD]. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.9M vs 220M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Dungeon Hunters [UPD] is charted above.

Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
3,917
playing now
6,794 24h peak · 268.9M visits
VS
Dungeon Hunters [UPD]
1,476
playing now
2,449 24h peak · 220M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Dungeon Hunters [UPD]

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Dungeon Hunters [UPD]Difference
Playing now3,9171,4762,441 (2.7×)
24h peak6,7942,4494,345 (2.8×)
24h average4,9411,7033,238 (2.9×)
7-day peak6,7942,8423,952 (2.4×)
7-day average4,9491,8813,068 (2.6×)
30-day peak6,7942,8423,952 (2.4×)
All-time peak7,7293,1704,559 (2.4×)
24h change 0.4% 9.4%
7d change 3.8% 1.2%
Total visits268.9M220M48.9M
Visits (24h)472.1K310.5K161.6K (1.5×)
Visits (7d)3.2M2.4M813.9K
Favorites5.6M1.8M3.8M (3.1×)
Rating96.5%98.4%
Global rank (players)#362#935of 8,339
Trending score-0.6-30.2
CreatedAug 12, 2021Oct 13, 2025
GenreSurvivalRPG

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 14 for Dungeon Hunters [UPD].