Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Dont Wake the Kitty
Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,599 concurrent players against 1,714, a 2.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Dont Wake the Kitty at 10,316 concurrent players, versus 7,729. Momentum favours Dont Wake the Kitty: +40.4% week over week versus +5.1% for Build to Survive [TESTING]. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.9M vs 66.7M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Dont Wake the Kitty is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,599
playing now
6,794 24h peak · 268.9M visits
VS
[🎀] Dont Wake the Kitty
1,714
playing now
2,781 24h peak · 66.7M visits
Player count history
Build to Survive [TESTING]Dont Wake the Kitty
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive [TESTING] | Dont Wake the Kitty | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,599 | 1,714 | 2,885 (2.7×) |
| 24h peak | 6,794 | 2,781 | 4,013 (2.4×) |
| 24h average | 5,214 | 2,071 | 3,143 (2.5×) |
| 7-day peak | 6,794 | 6,833 | 39 |
| 7-day average | 5,007 | 1,550 | 3,457 (3.2×) |
| 30-day peak | 6,794 | 6,833 | 39 |
| All-time peak | 7,729 | 10,316 | 2,587 |
| 24h change | ▲ 5.7% | ▼ 6.7% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 5.1% | ▲ 40.4% | — |
| Total visits | 268.9M | 66.7M | 202.2M (4.0×) |
| Visits (24h) | 481.7K | 317.5K | 164.2K (1.5×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.2M | 1.5M | 1.7M (2.1×) |
| Favorites | 5.6M | 195.9K | 5.4M (28.6×) |
| Rating | 96.5% | 95.1% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #344 | #919 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 15.3 | 109.8 | — |
| Created | Aug 12, 2021 | Oct 1, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for Dont Wake the Kitty.