Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [KAIJU] My Dancing Animals!
Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,599 concurrent players against 3,444. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 6,801. Momentum favours [KAIJU] My Dancing Animals!: +50.0% week over week versus +5.1% for Build to Survive [TESTING]. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.9M vs 3M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and [KAIJU] My Dancing Animals! is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,599
playing now
6,794 24h peak · 268.9M visits
VS
[KAIJU] My Dancing Animals!
3,444
playing now
6,801 24h peak · 3M visits
Player count history
Build to Survive [TESTING][KAIJU] My Dancing Animals!
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive [TESTING] | [KAIJU] My Dancing Animals! | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,599 | 3,444 | 1,155 |
| 24h peak | 6,794 | 6,801 | 7 |
| 24h average | 5,214 | 3,404 | 1,810 (1.5×) |
| 7-day peak | 6,794 | 6,801 | 7 |
| 7-day average | 5,007 | 2,559 | 2,448 (2.0×) |
| 30-day peak | 6,794 | 6,801 | 7 |
| All-time peak | 7,729 | 6,801 | 928 |
| 24h change | ▲ 5.7% | ▲ 27.6% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 5.1% | ▲ 50.0% | — |
| Total visits | 268.9M | 3M | 265.9M (90.5×) |
| Visits (24h) | 481.7K | 333K | 148.7K |
| Visits (7d) | 3.2M | 1.9M | 1.3M (1.7×) |
| Favorites | 5.6M | 16.9K | 5.6M (332.9×) |
| Rating | 96.5% | 98.3% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #344 | #472 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 15.3 | 115.5 | — |
| Created | Aug 12, 2021 | Dec 29, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 9 for [KAIJU] My Dancing Animals!.