Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [COMBAT] Overworld

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,363 concurrent players against 1,993, a 2.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 4,226. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +4.2% week over week versus -17.1% for [COMBAT] Overworld. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.9M vs 2.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and [COMBAT] Overworld is charted above.

Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,363
playing now
6,794 24h peak · 268.9M visits
VS
[COMBAT] Overworld
1,993
playing now
2,804 24h peak · 2.1M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING][COMBAT] Overworld

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] [COMBAT] OverworldDifference
Playing now4,3631,9932,370 (2.2×)
24h peak6,7942,8043,990 (2.4×)
24h average5,0272,0872,940 (2.4×)
7-day peak6,7942,8433,951 (2.4×)
7-day average4,9661,9183,048 (2.6×)
30-day peak6,7943,1853,609 (2.1×)
All-time peak7,7294,2263,503 (1.8×)
24h change 2.3% 6.2%
7d change 4.2% 17.1%
Total visits268.9M2.1M266.8M (128.2×)
Visits (24h)472.3K94.8K377.5K (5.0×)
Visits (7d)3.2M608.3K2.6M (5.2×)
Favorites5.6M96.1K5.5M (58.4×)
Rating96.5%94.4%
Global rank (players)#344#764of 8,339
Trending score4.528.9
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jan 7, 2026
GenreSurvivalRPG

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 14 for [COMBAT] Overworld.