Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Makeup Store Simulator

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,291 concurrent players against 1,553, a 2.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 3,545. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +4.1% week over week versus -2.0% for Makeup Store Simulator. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.9M vs 126.9M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Makeup Store Simulator is charted above.

Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,291
playing now
6,794 24h peak · 268.9M visits
VS
Makeup Store Simulator
1,553
playing now
2,766 24h peak · 126.9M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Makeup Store Simulator

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Makeup Store SimulatorDifference
Playing now4,2911,5532,738 (2.8×)
24h peak6,7942,7664,028 (2.5×)
24h average5,0052,0322,973 (2.5×)
7-day peak6,7943,5313,263 (1.9×)
7-day average4,9622,0382,924 (2.4×)
30-day peak6,7943,5313,263 (1.9×)
All-time peak7,7293,5454,184 (2.2×)
24h change 1.9% 22.3%
7d change 4.1% 2.0%
Total visits268.9M126.9M142M (2.1×)
Visits (24h)478.2K220.6K257.6K (2.2×)
Visits (7d)3.2M1.6M1.6M (2.1×)
Favorites5.6M276.6K5.3M (20.3×)
Rating96.5%92.2%
Global rank (players)#343#931of 8,339
Trending score3.2-1.0
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jun 9, 2025
GenreSurvivalSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 14 for Makeup Store Simulator.