Build to Survive [TESTING] vs DANGEROUS NIGHT [FURNISH THE BUNKER]

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,291 concurrent players against 1,408, a 3.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 3,718. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +4.1% week over week versus -7.9% for DANGEROUS NIGHT [FURNISH THE BUNKER]. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.9M vs 198.2M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and DANGEROUS NIGHT [FURNISH THE BUNKER] is charted above.

Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,291
playing now
6,794 24h peak · 268.9M visits
VS
DANGEROUS NIGHT [FURNISH THE BUNKER]
1,408
playing now
3,526 24h peak · 198.2M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]DANGEROUS NIGHT [FURNISH THE BUNKER]

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] DANGEROUS NIGHT [FURNISH THE BUNKER]Difference
Playing now4,2911,4082,883 (3.0×)
24h peak6,7943,5263,268 (1.9×)
24h average5,0051,9773,028 (2.5×)
7-day peak6,7943,5263,268 (1.9×)
7-day average4,9621,9603,002 (2.5×)
30-day peak6,7943,5263,268 (1.9×)
All-time peak7,7293,7184,011 (2.1×)
24h change 1.9% 13.1%
7d change 4.1% 7.9%
Total visits268.9M198.2M70.7M
Visits (24h)478.2K209.9K268.3K (2.3×)
Visits (7d)3.2M1.3M1.9M (2.4×)
Favorites5.6M357.6K5.3M (15.7×)
Rating96.5%81.4%
Global rank (players)#343#1,010of 8,339
Trending score3.22.8
CreatedAug 12, 2021Mar 29, 2025
GenreSurvivalSurvival

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 13 for DANGEROUS NIGHT [FURNISH THE BUNKER].