Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Wavelength! [BETA]
Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,851 concurrent players against 1,455, a 3.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 1,958. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +16.2% week over week versus -4.7% for Wavelength! [BETA]. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268M vs 60.4M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Wavelength! [BETA] is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,851
playing now
6,224 24h peak · 268M visits
VS
Wavelength! [BETA]
1,455
playing now
1,475 24h peak · 60.4M visits
Player count history
Build to Survive [TESTING]Wavelength! [BETA]
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive [TESTING] | Wavelength! [BETA] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,851 | 1,455 | 3,396 (3.3×) |
| 24h peak | 6,224 | 1,475 | 4,749 (4.2×) |
| 24h average | 4,919 | 1,051 | 3,868 (4.7×) |
| 7-day peak | 7,557 | 1,917 | 5,640 (3.9×) |
| 7-day average | 5,186 | 957 | 4,229 (5.4×) |
| 30-day peak | 7,557 | 1,917 | 5,640 (3.9×) |
| All-time peak | 7,729 | 1,958 | 5,771 (3.9×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 4.0% | ▲ 39.4% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 16.2% | ▼ 4.7% | — |
| Total visits | 268M | 60.4M | 207.5M (4.4×) |
| Visits (24h) | 425.2K | 111.4K | 313.9K (3.8×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.3M | 926.9K | 2.4M (3.6×) |
| Favorites | 5.6M | 145.4K | 5.4M (38.5×) |
| Rating | 96.5% | 93.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #356 | #1,114 | of 7,662 |
| Trending score | -18.9 | 29.0 | — |
| Created | Aug 12, 2021 | Jun 28, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Party & Casual | — |
Other comparisons
Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Giga Mansion TycoonBuild to Survive [TESTING] vs Bendy and the ink MachineBuild to Survive [TESTING] vs [UPD] Violent Party!Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [UPDATE] Marvel OmegaBuild to Survive [TESTING] vs [PETS!] +1 Double Jump Bike Escape!Build to Survive [TESTING] vs +1 Speed Wings EscapeCompare two other games →
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for Wavelength! [BETA].