Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [PETS!] +1 Double Jump Bike Escape!
Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,587 concurrent players against 1,142, a 4.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 3,240. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +16.4% week over week versus -37.9% for [PETS!] +1 Double Jump Bike Escape!. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268M vs 12.5M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and [PETS!] +1 Double Jump Bike Escape! is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive [TESTING] | [PETS!] +1 Double Jump Bike Escape! | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,587 | 1,142 | 3,445 (4.0×) |
| 24h peak | 6,224 | 1,393 | 4,831 (4.5×) |
| 24h average | 4,943 | 1,073 | 3,870 (4.6×) |
| 7-day peak | 7,557 | 1,916 | 5,641 (3.9×) |
| 7-day average | 5,192 | 1,199 | 3,993 (4.3×) |
| 30-day peak | 7,557 | 3,240 | 4,317 (2.3×) |
| All-time peak | 7,729 | 3,240 | 4,489 (2.4×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 3.5% | ▼ 2.1% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 16.4% | ▼ 37.9% | — |
| Total visits | 268M | 12.5M | 255.5M (21.5×) |
| Visits (24h) | 423.8K | 132.3K | 291.5K (3.2×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.3M | 1.2M | 2.2M (2.8×) |
| Favorites | 5.6M | 27.4K | 5.6M (204.4×) |
| Rating | 96.5% | 97.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #357 | #1,342 | of 7,662 |
| Trending score | -17.6 | -31.2 | — |
| Created | Aug 12, 2021 | Jul 3, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for [PETS!] +1 Double Jump Bike Escape!.