Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [UPDATE] Marvel Omega
Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,851 concurrent players against 1,376, a 3.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 1,933. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +16.2% week over week versus -0.4% for [UPDATE] Marvel Omega. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268M vs 63.2M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and [UPDATE] Marvel Omega is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,851
playing now
6,224 24h peak · 268M visits
VS
[UPDATE] Marvel Omega
1,376
playing now
1,469 24h peak · 63.2M visits
Player count history
Build to Survive [TESTING][UPDATE] Marvel Omega
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive [TESTING] | [UPDATE] Marvel Omega | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,851 | 1,376 | 3,475 (3.5×) |
| 24h peak | 6,224 | 1,469 | 4,755 (4.2×) |
| 24h average | 4,919 | 1,206 | 3,713 (4.1×) |
| 7-day peak | 7,557 | 1,916 | 5,641 (3.9×) |
| 7-day average | 5,186 | 1,217 | 3,969 (4.3×) |
| 30-day peak | 7,557 | 1,916 | 5,641 (3.9×) |
| All-time peak | 7,729 | 1,933 | 5,796 (4.0×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 4.0% | ▲ 16.5% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 16.2% | ▼ 0.4% | — |
| Total visits | 268M | 63.2M | 204.7M (4.2×) |
| Visits (24h) | 425.2K | 114.7K | 310.5K (3.7×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.3M | 949.6K | 2.4M (3.5×) |
| Favorites | 5.6M | 80.9K | 5.5M (69.2×) |
| Rating | 96.5% | 90.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #356 | #1,131 | of 7,662 |
| Trending score | -18.9 | -2.7 | — |
| Created | Aug 12, 2021 | Oct 14, 2024 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Action | — |
Other comparisons
Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Giga Mansion TycoonBuild to Survive [TESTING] vs Bendy and the ink MachineBuild to Survive [TESTING] vs [UPD] Violent Party!Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [PETS!] +1 Double Jump Bike Escape!Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Wavelength! [BETA]Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [x2 LUCK] Roll for Anime!Compare two other games →
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for [UPDATE] Marvel Omega.