Build to Survive [TESTING] vs +1 Speed Wings Escape

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,769 concurrent players against 960, a 5.0Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 2,572. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +16.0% week over week versus -27.1% for +1 Speed Wings Escape. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (267.9M vs 57.5M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and +1 Speed Wings Escape is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,769
playing now
6,224 24h peak Β· 267.9M visits
VS
+1 Speed Wings Escape πŸ¦…
960
playing now
1,238 24h peak Β· 57.5M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]+1 Speed Wings Escape

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] +1 Speed Wings EscapeDifference
Playing now4,7699603,809 (5.0Γ—)
24h peak6,2241,2384,986 (5.0Γ—)
24h average4,8939753,918 (5.0Γ—)
7-day peak7,5571,9205,637 (3.9Γ—)
7-day average5,1791,1574,022 (4.5Γ—)
30-day peak7,5571,9205,637 (3.9Γ—)
All-time peak7,7292,5725,157 (3.0Γ—)
24h changeβ–Ό 4.3%β–Ό 7.7%β€”
7d changeβ–² 16.0%β–Ό 27.1%β€”
Total visits267.9M57.5M210.5M (4.7Γ—)
Visits (24h)425.5K109.1K316.5K (3.9Γ—)
Visits (7d)3.3M943.1K2.4M (3.5Γ—)
Favorites5.6M3.9M1.7M
Rating96.5%98.1%β€”
Global rank (players)#348#1,478of 7,662
Trending score-20.3-46.1β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Mar 23, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for +1 Speed Wings Escape.

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs +1 Speed Wings Escape β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals