Build to Survive [TESTING] vs British Railway

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,709 concurrent players against 433, a 10.9Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 2,076. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +15.7% week over week versus -10.4% for British Railway. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (267.9M vs 36.5M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and British Railway is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,709
playing now
6,224 24h peak Β· 267.9M visits
VS
British Railway
433
playing now
1,718 24h peak Β· 36.5M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]British Railway

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] British RailwayDifference
Playing now4,7094334,276 (10.9Γ—)
24h peak6,2241,7184,506 (3.6Γ—)
24h average4,8309283,902 (5.2Γ—)
7-day peak7,5571,9235,634 (3.9Γ—)
7-day average5,1671,1414,026 (4.5Γ—)
30-day peak7,5572,0255,532 (3.7Γ—)
All-time peak7,7292,0765,653 (3.7Γ—)
24h changeβ–Ό 5.7%β–Ό 12.1%β€”
7d changeβ–² 15.7%β–Ό 10.4%β€”
Total visits267.9M36.5M231.4M (7.3Γ—)
Visits (24h)420.7K66K354.7K (6.4Γ—)
Visits (7d)3.3M509.5K2.8M (6.5Γ—)
Favorites5.6M109.9K5.5M (50.9Γ—)
Rating96.5%87.3%β€”
Global rank (players)#343#2,106of 7,662
Trending score-23.9-54.3β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jul 1, 2022β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for British Railway.

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs British Railway β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals