Build to Survive [TESTING] vs BAD CAT

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,608 concurrent players against 1,504, a 3.1× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 3,185. Momentum favours BAD CAT: +10.8% week over week versus +5.2% for Build to Survive [TESTING]. Lifetime, BAD CAT has more visits (371.4M vs 268.8M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and BAD CAT is charted above.

Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,608
playing now
6,794 24h peak · 268.8M visits
VS
BAD CAT
1,504
playing now
2,383 24h peak · 371.4M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]BAD CAT

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] BAD CATDifference
Playing now4,6081,5043,104 (3.1×)
24h peak6,7942,3834,411 (2.9×)
24h average5,2511,7973,454 (2.9×)
7-day peak6,7943,0273,767 (2.2×)
7-day average5,0141,4443,570 (3.5×)
30-day peak6,7943,0273,767 (2.2×)
All-time peak7,7293,1854,544 (2.4×)
24h change 6.5% 17.1%
7d change 5.2% 10.8%
Total visits268.8M371.4M102.5M
Visits (24h)478.7K236K242.7K (2.0×)
Visits (7d)3.2M1.3M1.9M (2.4×)
Favorites5.6M1.1M4.5M (5.1×)
Rating96.5%86.5%
Global rank (players)#342#1,005of 8,283
Trending score17.578.3
CreatedAug 12, 2021Aug 30, 2021
GenreSurvivalRoleplay & Avatar Sim

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for BAD CAT.