Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [PENTHOUSE] STAY INSIDE
Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,359 concurrent players against 1,716, a 2.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 3,035. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +4.7% week over week versus -11.5% for [PENTHOUSE] STAY INSIDE. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.9M vs 29.7M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and [PENTHOUSE] STAY INSIDE is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive [TESTING] | [PENTHOUSE] STAY INSIDE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,359 | 1,716 | 2,643 (2.5×) |
| 24h peak | 6,794 | 2,920 | 3,874 (2.3×) |
| 24h average | 5,130 | 2,179 | 2,951 (2.4×) |
| 7-day peak | 6,794 | 3,035 | 3,759 (2.2×) |
| 7-day average | 4,988 | 1,748 | 3,240 (2.9×) |
| 30-day peak | 6,794 | 3,035 | 3,759 (2.2×) |
| All-time peak | 7,729 | 3,035 | 4,694 (2.5×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 4.2% | ▼ 2.6% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 4.7% | ▼ 11.5% | — |
| Total visits | 268.9M | 29.7M | 239.1M (9.0×) |
| Visits (24h) | 475.4K | 218K | 257.3K (2.2×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.2M | 1.2M | 2M (2.7×) |
| Favorites | 5.6M | 299.8K | 5.3M (18.7×) |
| Rating | 96.5% | 94.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #352 | #897 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 10.5 | 81.2 | — |
| Created | Aug 12, 2021 | Nov 28, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for [PENTHOUSE] STAY INSIDE.