Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Be a YouTuber!

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,300 concurrent players against 614, a 7.0Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 4,449. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +16.0% week over week versus -1.9% for Be a YouTuber!. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268M vs 126.9M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Be a YouTuber! is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,300
playing now
6,224 24h peak Β· 268M visits
VS
Be a YouTuber! πŸ”΄πŸŽ₯
614
playing now
949 24h peak Β· 126.9M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Be a YouTuber!

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Be a YouTuber!Difference
Playing now4,3006143,686 (7.0Γ—)
24h peak6,2249495,275 (6.6Γ—)
24h average4,8876224,265 (7.9Γ—)
7-day peak7,5572,3715,186 (3.2Γ—)
7-day average5,1788204,358 (6.3Γ—)
30-day peak7,5572,3715,186 (3.2Γ—)
All-time peak7,7294,4493,280 (1.7Γ—)
24h changeβ–Ό 4.8%β–² 6.9%β€”
7d changeβ–² 16.0%β–Ό 1.9%β€”
Total visits268M126.9M141.1M (2.1Γ—)
Visits (24h)431K81K350K (5.3Γ—)
Visits (7d)3.3M751.8K2.6M (4.4Γ—)
Favorites5.6M881.2K4.7M (6.4Γ—)
Rating96.5%97.8%β€”
Global rank (players)#356#1,824of 7,662
Trending score-20.6-65.6β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Aug 28, 2025β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for Be a YouTuber!.

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Be a YouTuber! β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals