Strongman Simulator vs Build to Survive [TESTING]
Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,300 concurrent players against 1,910, a 2.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 2,386. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +16.0% week over week versus +6.6% for Strongman Simulator. Lifetime, Strongman Simulator has more visits (1.7B vs 268M). Full side-by-side history for Strongman Simulator and Build to Survive [TESTING] is charted above.
Strongman Simulator
1,910
playing now
2,205 24h peak · 1.7B visits
VS
Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,300
playing now
6,224 24h peak · 268M visits
Player count history
Strongman SimulatorBuild to Survive [TESTING]
Head to head
| Metric | Strongman Simulator | Build to Survive [TESTING] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,910 | 4,300 | 2,390 (2.3×) |
| 24h peak | 2,205 | 6,224 | 4,019 (2.8×) |
| 24h average | 1,743 | 4,887 | 3,144 (2.8×) |
| 7-day peak | 2,371 | 7,557 | 5,186 (3.2×) |
| 7-day average | 1,572 | 5,178 | 3,606 (3.3×) |
| 30-day peak | 2,371 | 7,557 | 5,186 (3.2×) |
| All-time peak | 2,386 | 7,729 | 5,343 (3.2×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 12.5% | ▼ 4.8% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 6.6% | ▲ 16.0% | — |
| Total visits | 1.7B | 268M | 1.4B (6.2×) |
| Visits (24h) | 172K | 431K | 259K (2.5×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.1M | 3.3M | 2.2M (2.9×) |
| Favorites | 2.7M | 5.6M | 2.9M (2.0×) |
| Rating | 92.8% | 96.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #803 | #356 | of 7,662 |
| Trending score | 34.7 | -20.6 | — |
| Created | May 4, 2021 | Aug 12, 2021 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Strongman Simulator, 11 for Build to Survive [TESTING].