Build to Survive [TESTING] vs TEAM GRANDMA ESCAPE!🏻 (TEAMWORK OBBY)
Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,313 concurrent players against 728, a 5.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 2,401. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +15.7% week over week versus -8.0% for TEAM GRANDMA ESCAPE!🏻 (TEAMWORK OBBY). Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268M vs 245.5M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and TEAM GRANDMA ESCAPE!🏻 (TEAMWORK OBBY) is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive [TESTING] | TEAM GRANDMA ESCAPE!🏻 (TEAMWORK OBBY) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,313 | 728 | 3,585 (5.9×) |
| 24h peak | 6,224 | 1,636 | 4,588 (3.8×) |
| 24h average | 4,844 | 1,119 | 3,725 (4.3×) |
| 7-day peak | 7,557 | 2,374 | 5,183 (3.2×) |
| 7-day average | 5,168 | 1,234 | 3,934 (4.2×) |
| 30-day peak | 7,557 | 2,374 | 5,183 (3.2×) |
| All-time peak | 7,729 | 2,401 | 5,328 (3.2×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 6.1% | ▼ 15.5% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 15.7% | ▼ 8.0% | — |
| Total visits | 268M | 245.5M | 22.5M |
| Visits (24h) | 429.6K | 201.5K | 228.1K (2.1×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.3M | 1.5M | 1.8M (2.2×) |
| Favorites | 5.6M | 18.4M | 12.8M (3.3×) |
| Rating | 96.5% | 58.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #360 | #1,612 | of 7,707 |
| Trending score | -23.0 | -27.9 | — |
| Created | Aug 12, 2021 | Aug 17, 2023 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Obby & Platformer | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for TEAM GRANDMA ESCAPE!🏻 (TEAMWORK OBBY).