Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Jurassic Blocky

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,474 concurrent players against 1,177, a 3.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 2,467. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +15.4% week over week versus +15.3% for Jurassic Blocky. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268M vs 249.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Jurassic Blocky is charted above.

Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,474
playing now
6,224 24h peak · 268M visits
VS
Jurassic Blocky
1,177
playing now
1,787 24h peak · 249.1M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Jurassic Blocky

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Jurassic BlockyDifference
Playing now4,4741,1773,297 (3.8×)
24h peak6,2241,7874,437 (3.5×)
24h average4,8291,3273,502 (3.6×)
7-day peak7,5572,3765,181 (3.2×)
7-day average5,1601,4863,674 (3.5×)
30-day peak7,5572,3765,181 (3.2×)
All-time peak7,7292,4675,262 (3.1×)
24h change 6.5% 1.6%
7d change 15.4% 15.3%
Total visits268M249.1M18.9M
Visits (24h)427.9K181.4K246.6K (2.4×)
Visits (7d)3.3M1.4M1.9M (2.3×)
Favorites5.6M382.3K5.2M (14.6×)
Rating96.5%89.3%
Global rank (players)#350#1,188of 7,707
Trending score-23.5-32.9
CreatedAug 12, 2021Nov 24, 2022
GenreSurvivalRoleplay & Avatar Sim

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for Jurassic Blocky.