Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] vs Build to Survive [TESTING]
Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,731 concurrent players against 1,841, a 2.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 2,386. Momentum favours Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS]: +16.9% week over week versus +15.4% for Build to Survive [TESTING]. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.1M vs 98M). Full side-by-side history for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] and Build to Survive [TESTING] is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS] | Build to Survive [TESTING] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,841 | 4,731 | 2,890 (2.6×) |
| 24h peak | 1,951 | 6,224 | 4,273 (3.2×) |
| 24h average | 1,694 | 4,856 | 3,162 (2.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 2,378 | 7,557 | 5,179 (3.2×) |
| 7-day average | 1,664 | 5,163 | 3,499 (3.1×) |
| 30-day peak | 2,378 | 7,557 | 5,179 (3.2×) |
| All-time peak | 2,386 | 7,729 | 5,343 (3.2×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 14.1% | ▼ 5.8% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 16.9% | ▲ 15.4% | — |
| Total visits | 98M | 268.1M | 170.1M (2.7×) |
| Visits (24h) | 119.2K | 424K | 304.8K (3.6×) |
| Visits (7d) | 931.1K | 3.3M | 2.4M (3.6×) |
| Favorites | 1.8M | 5.6M | 3.8M (3.1×) |
| Rating | 91.4% | 96.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #832 | #341 | of 7,707 |
| Trending score | 5.7 | -21.8 | — |
| Created | Jun 30, 2017 | Aug 12, 2021 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Build a Medieval Army [SHIELDS], 11 for Build to Survive [TESTING].