Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [UPD]Samurai DUELS

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,559 concurrent players against 814, a 5.6Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 2,370. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +16.3% week over week versus +4.9% for [UPD]Samurai DUELS. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268M vs 49.8M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and [UPD]Samurai DUELS is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,559
playing now
6,224 24h peak Β· 268M visits
VS
[UPD]Samurai DUELS
814
playing now
1,405 24h peak Β· 49.8M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING][UPD]Samurai DUELS

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] [UPD]Samurai DUELSDifference
Playing now4,5598143,745 (5.6Γ—)
24h peak6,2241,4054,819 (4.4Γ—)
24h average4,9268884,038 (5.5Γ—)
7-day peak7,5572,3705,187 (3.2Γ—)
7-day average5,1901,2113,979 (4.3Γ—)
30-day peak7,5572,3705,187 (3.2Γ—)
All-time peak7,7292,3705,359 (3.3Γ—)
24h changeβ–Ό 4.0%β–² 7.8%β€”
7d changeβ–² 16.3%β–² 4.9%β€”
Total visits268M49.8M218.2M (5.4Γ—)
Visits (24h)425.1K159.5K265.6K (2.7Γ—)
Visits (7d)3.3M1.5M1.8M (2.2Γ—)
Favorites5.6M118.7K5.5M (47.1Γ—)
Rating96.5%93.3%β€”
Global rank (players)#353#1,584of 7,662
Trending score-18.7-77.2β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Apr 20, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalActionβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for [UPD]Samurai DUELS.

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [UPD]Samurai DUELS β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals