Build to Survive vs Backrooms

Build to Survive currently leads with 4,702 concurrent players against 3,207. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 5,957. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (405M vs 172.6M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Backrooms is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ
4,702
playing now
6,607 24h peak Β· 405M visits
VS
Backrooms
3,207
playing now
5,957 24h peak Β· 172.6M visits

Player count history

Build to SurviveBackrooms

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive BackroomsDifference
Playing now4,7023,2071,495
24h peak6,6075,957650
24h average4,9073,5941,313
7-day peak6,7445,957787
7-day average5,1763,2181,958 (1.6Γ—)
30-day peak6,7445,957787
All-time peak6,7445,957787
24h changeβ–Ό 4.8%β–² 2.5%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits405M172.6M232.4M (2.3Γ—)
Visits (24h)485.9K605.9K120K
Visits (7d)1.2M1.8M552.2K
Favorites10.9M3.1M7.8M (3.5Γ—)
Rating96.2%81.3%β€”
Global rank (players)#342#514of 4,381
Trending score-19.141.2β€”
CreatedFeb 12, 2021Apr 3, 2022β€”
GenreSurvivalSurvivalβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for Build to Survive, 5 for Backrooms.

Build to Survive vs Backrooms β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals