Build to Survive vs FNAF: Eternal Nights
FNAF: Eternal Nights currently leads with 5,698 concurrent players against 5,014. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 5,983. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (405M vs 313.3M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and FNAF: Eternal Nights is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
5,014
playing now
6,607 24h peak · 405M visits
VS
FNAF: Eternal Nights 🍕
5,698
playing now
5,832 24h peak · 313.3M visits
Player count history
Build to SurviveFNAF: Eternal Nights
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | FNAF: Eternal Nights | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 5,014 | 5,698 | 684 |
| 24h peak | 6,607 | 5,832 | 775 |
| 24h average | 4,970 | 4,516 | 454 |
| 7-day peak | 6,744 | 5,983 | 761 |
| 7-day average | 5,186 | 4,379 | 807 |
| 30-day peak | 6,744 | 5,983 | 761 |
| All-time peak | 6,744 | 5,983 | 761 |
| 24h change | ▼ 4.1% | ▲ 38.4% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 405M | 313.3M | 91.8M |
| Visits (24h) | 481.5K | 512.4K | 30.9K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.3M | 1.9M | 592.2K |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 837K | 10M (13.0×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 94.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #335 | #281 | of 4,381 |
| Trending score | -15.3 | 11.4 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Oct 27, 2022 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Build to Survive vs [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 CommanderBuild to Survive vs [CUSTOM SERVERS] Sing It! Karaoke Battles [VC]Build to Survive vs Nullscape [DOOM IN BLOOM]Build to Survive vs Power a CityBuild to Survive vs [FREE INVINCIBLE FREE COSMIC] Divine BattlegroundsBuild to Survive vs Color or DieCompare two other games →
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Build to Survive, 5 for FNAF: Eternal Nights.