Build to Survive vs Power a City
Build to Survive currently leads with 5,110 concurrent players against 3,878. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 5,985. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (405M vs 2.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Power a City is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
5,110
playing now
6,607 24h peak · 405M visits
VS
⚡Power a City
3,878
playing now
5,985 24h peak · 2.1M visits
Player count history
Build to SurvivePower a City
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | Power a City | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 5,110 | 3,878 | 1,232 |
| 24h peak | 6,607 | 5,985 | 622 |
| 24h average | 4,970 | 4,550 | 420 |
| 7-day peak | 6,744 | 5,985 | 759 |
| 7-day average | 5,186 | 4,364 | 822 |
| 30-day peak | 6,744 | 5,985 | 759 |
| All-time peak | 6,744 | 5,985 | 759 |
| 24h change | ▼ 4.1% | ▲ 14.3% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 405M | 2.1M | 402.9M (190.6×) |
| Visits (24h) | 481.5K | 429K | 52.4K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.3M | 1.4M | 131.7K |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 12.8K | 10.8M (849.7×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 93.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #335 | #438 | of 4,381 |
| Trending score | -15.3 | 15.5 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Jun 16, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Build to Survive vs [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 CommanderBuild to Survive vs [CUSTOM SERVERS] Sing It! Karaoke Battles [VC]Build to Survive vs Nullscape [DOOM IN BLOOM]Build to Survive vs FNAF: Eternal NightsBuild to Survive vs [FREE INVINCIBLE FREE COSMIC] Divine BattlegroundsBuild to Survive vs Color or DieCompare two other games →
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Build to Survive, 5 for Power a City.