Build to Survive vs [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander
Build to Survive currently leads with 5,160 concurrent players against 5,101. On all-time peak the record belongs to [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander at 6,746 concurrent players, versus 6,744. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (404.9M vs 22.2M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
5,160
playing now
6,607 24h peak · 404.9M visits
VS
[Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander
5,101
playing now
6,480 24h peak · 22.2M visits
Player count history
Build to Survive[Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 5,160 | 5,101 | 59 |
| 24h peak | 6,607 | 6,480 | 127 |
| 24h average | 5,275 | 4,956 | 319 |
| 7-day peak | 6,744 | 6,746 | 2 |
| 7-day average | 5,263 | 4,922 | 341 |
| 30-day peak | 6,744 | 6,746 | 2 |
| All-time peak | 6,744 | 6,746 | 2 |
| 24h change | ▲ 1.6% | ▲ 7.9% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 404.9M | 22.2M | 382.8M (18.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 503.5K | 513.1K | 9.6K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.2M | 1.8M | 596.7K (1.5×) |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 84.1K | 10.8M (129.1×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 95.1% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #310 | #312 | of 4,279 |
| Trending score | 0.8 | 2.5 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Jun 10, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for Build to Survive, 4 for [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander.