Build to Survive vs [NEW AREA ] Eternal Towers of Hell
Build to Survive currently leads with 5,182 concurrent players against 3,442, a 1.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 7,252 concurrent players, versus 7,200. Momentum favours [NEW AREA ] Eternal Towers of Hell: +15.3% week over week versus -4.3% for Build to Survive. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (409.6M vs 116M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and [NEW AREA ] Eternal Towers of Hell is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
5,182
playing now
6,972 24h peak · 409.6M visits
VS
[NEW AREA 🌙] Eternal Towers of Hell
3,442
playing now
7,200 24h peak · 116M visits
Player count history
Build to Survive[NEW AREA ] Eternal Towers of Hell
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | [NEW AREA ] Eternal Towers of Hell | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 5,182 | 3,442 | 1,740 (1.5×) |
| 24h peak | 6,972 | 7,200 | 228 |
| 24h average | 5,774 | 3,022 | 2,752 (1.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 7,086 | 7,200 | 114 |
| 7-day average | 5,091 | 1,881 | 3,210 (2.7×) |
| 30-day peak | 7,086 | 7,200 | 114 |
| All-time peak | 7,252 | 7,200 | 52 |
| 24h change | ▲ 4.3% | ▲ 68.9% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 4.3% | ▲ 15.3% | — |
| Total visits | 409.6M | 116M | 293.5M (3.5×) |
| Visits (24h) | 543.7K | 167.4K | 376.3K (3.2×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.5M | 902.6K | 2.6M (3.8×) |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 190K | 10.7M (57.6×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 79.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #341 | #534 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 50.2 | 208.4 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Jan 17, 2022 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Obby & Platformer | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build to Survive, 13 for [NEW AREA ] Eternal Towers of Hell.