Build to Survive vs Build to Defend Loot
Build to Survive currently leads with 4,810 concurrent players against 1,624, a 3.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 7,252 concurrent players, versus 7,220. Momentum favours Build to Defend Loot: +12.6% week over week versus -4.9% for Build to Survive. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (409.6M vs 112.4M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Build to Defend Loot is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
4,810
playing now
6,972 24h peak · 409.6M visits
VS
⚔️Build to Defend Loot
1,624
playing now
7,220 24h peak · 112.4M visits
Player count history
Build to SurviveBuild to Defend Loot
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | Build to Defend Loot | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,810 | 1,624 | 3,186 (3.0×) |
| 24h peak | 6,972 | 7,220 | 248 |
| 24h average | 5,670 | 2,888 | 2,782 (2.0×) |
| 7-day peak | 7,086 | 7,220 | 134 |
| 7-day average | 5,057 | 2,214 | 2,843 (2.3×) |
| 30-day peak | 7,086 | 7,220 | 134 |
| All-time peak | 7,252 | 7,220 | 32 |
| 24h change | ▲ 3.3% | ▲ 39.9% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 4.9% | ▲ 12.6% | — |
| Total visits | 409.6M | 112.4M | 297.2M (3.6×) |
| Visits (24h) | 546K | 322K | 223.9K (1.7×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.5M | 2M | 1.4M (1.7×) |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 97.5K | 10.8M (112.2×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 87.1% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #346 | #971 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 45.3 | 104.2 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Jan 3, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build to Survive, 12 for Build to Defend Loot.