Build to Survive vs Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha]
Build to Survive currently leads with 5,182 concurrent players against 4,959. On all-time peak the record belongs to Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha] at 7,292 concurrent players, versus 7,252. Momentum favours Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha]: +37.7% week over week versus -4.4% for Build to Survive. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (409.6M vs 56.2M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha] is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
5,182
playing now
6,972 24h peak · 409.6M visits
VS
Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha]
4,959
playing now
6,546 24h peak · 56.2M visits
Player count history
Build to SurviveSurvive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha]
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 5,182 | 4,959 | 223 |
| 24h peak | 6,972 | 6,546 | 426 |
| 24h average | 5,742 | 5,322 | 420 |
| 7-day peak | 7,086 | 7,110 | 24 |
| 7-day average | 5,084 | 4,457 | 627 |
| 30-day peak | 7,086 | 7,110 | 24 |
| All-time peak | 7,252 | 7,292 | 40 |
| 24h change | ▲ 3.7% | ▼ 0.5% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 4.4% | ▲ 37.7% | — |
| Total visits | 409.6M | 56.2M | 353.3M (7.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 547.5K | 637.7K | 90.1K |
| Visits (7d) | 3.5M | 3.8M | 378.2K |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 165.2K | 10.8M (66.2×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 74.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #341 | #360 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 48.4 | 71.9 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | May 30, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Build to Survive, 12 for Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha].