Build to Survive vs [UPD] Soccer Stars 26
Build to Survive currently leads with 4,529 concurrent players against 3,217. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,925 concurrent players, versus 6,329. Momentum favours [UPD] Soccer Stars 26: +75.7% week over week versus -4.7% for Build to Survive. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (408.1M vs 36.9M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and [UPD] Soccer Stars 26 is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
4,529
playing now
5,944 24h peak · 408.1M visits
VS
[UPD] Soccer Stars 26
3,217
playing now
6,329 24h peak · 36.9M visits
Player count history
Build to Survive[UPD] Soccer Stars 26
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | [UPD] Soccer Stars 26 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,529 | 3,217 | 1,312 |
| 24h peak | 5,944 | 6,329 | 385 |
| 24h average | 4,484 | 4,231 | 253 |
| 7-day peak | 6,917 | 6,329 | 588 |
| 7-day average | 4,969 | 3,663 | 1,306 |
| 30-day peak | 6,917 | 6,329 | 588 |
| All-time peak | 6,925 | 6,329 | 596 |
| 24h change | ▼ 1.9% | ▼ 10.9% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 4.7% | ▲ 75.7% | — |
| Total visits | 408.1M | 36.9M | 371.2M (11.1×) |
| Visits (24h) | 425K | 1M | 615K (2.4×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.5M | 5.7M | 2.2M (1.6×) |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 727.1K | 10.2M (15.0×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 80.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #269 | #397 | of 7,215 |
| Trending score | -35.5 | 55.9 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Jun 1, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Sports & Racing | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for Build to Survive, 11 for [UPD] Soccer Stars 26.