Build to Survive vs Ninja Challenge [BETA]
Build to Survive currently leads with 4,296 concurrent players against 2,198, a 2.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,925 concurrent players, versus 6,465. Momentum favours Ninja Challenge [BETA]: +37.9% week over week versus -5.0% for Build to Survive. Lifetime, Ninja Challenge [BETA] has more visits (721.6M vs 408.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Ninja Challenge [BETA] is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
4,296
playing now
5,944 24h peak · 408.1M visits
VS
💪Ninja Challenge [BETA]
2,198
playing now
5,263 24h peak · 721.6M visits
Player count history
Build to SurviveNinja Challenge [BETA]
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | Ninja Challenge [BETA] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,296 | 2,198 | 2,098 (2.0×) |
| 24h peak | 5,944 | 5,263 | 681 |
| 24h average | 4,420 | 3,568 | 852 |
| 7-day peak | 6,917 | 6,320 | 597 |
| 7-day average | 4,959 | 4,239 | 720 |
| 30-day peak | 6,917 | 6,320 | 597 |
| All-time peak | 6,925 | 6,465 | 460 |
| 24h change | ▼ 3.0% | ▼ 18.9% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 5.0% | ▲ 37.9% | — |
| Total visits | 408.1M | 721.6M | 313.5M (1.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 423.8K | 983.5K | 559.6K (2.3×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.5M | 7.6M | 4.1M (2.2×) |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 426.4K | 10.5M (25.6×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 78.1% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #284 | #545 | of 7,213 |
| Trending score | -39.4 | -55.9 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Aug 4, 2024 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Obby & Platformer | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for Build to Survive, 11 for Ninja Challenge [BETA].