Build to Survive vs Prove You Are Not a Dum-Dum

Build to Survive currently leads with 5,243 concurrent players against 399, a 13.1Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 2,618. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (405M vs 27.4M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and Prove You Are Not a Dum-Dum is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ
5,243
playing now
6,607 24h peak Β· 405M visits
VS
Prove You Are Not a Dum-Dum
399
playing now
909 24h peak Β· 27.4M visits

Player count history

Build to SurviveProve You Are Not a Dum-Dum

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive Prove You Are Not a Dum-DumDifference
Playing now5,2433994,844 (13.1Γ—)
24h peak6,6079095,698 (7.3Γ—)
24h average5,0696074,462 (8.4Γ—)
7-day peak6,7442,6184,126 (2.6Γ—)
7-day average5,2041,5033,701 (3.5Γ—)
30-day peak6,7442,6184,126 (2.6Γ—)
All-time peak6,7442,6184,126 (2.6Γ—)
24h changeβ–Ό 2.2%β–Ό 50.7%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits405M27.4M377.6M (14.8Γ—)
Visits (24h)493.8K64K429.8K (7.7Γ—)
Visits (7d)1.3M405.9K864.8K (3.1Γ—)
Favorites10.9M729.2K10.1M (14.9Γ—)
Rating96.2%73.6%β€”
Global rank (players)#318#1,962of 4,381
Trending score-9.6-163.6β€”
CreatedFeb 12, 2021Oct 26, 2025β€”
GenreSurvivalPuzzleβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for Build to Survive, 5 for Prove You Are Not a Dum-Dum.

Build to Survive vs Prove You Are Not a Dum-Dum β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals