Forgotten Worlds vs Build to Survive
Build to Survive currently leads with 5,211 concurrent players against 2,104, a 2.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 2,613. Lifetime, Forgotten Worlds has more visits (596.8M vs 405M). Full side-by-side history for Forgotten Worlds and Build to Survive is charted above.
Forgotten Worlds
2,104
playing now
2,613 24h peak · 596.8M visits
VS
Build to Survive 🛠️
5,211
playing now
6,607 24h peak · 405M visits
Player count history
Forgotten WorldsBuild to Survive
Head to head
| Metric | Forgotten Worlds | Build to Survive | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,104 | 5,211 | 3,107 (2.5×) |
| 24h peak | 2,613 | 6,607 | 3,994 (2.5×) |
| 24h average | 2,047 | 5,035 | 2,988 (2.5×) |
| 7-day peak | 2,613 | 6,744 | 4,131 (2.6×) |
| 7-day average | 2,015 | 5,198 | 3,183 (2.6×) |
| 30-day peak | 2,613 | 6,744 | 4,131 (2.6×) |
| All-time peak | 2,613 | 6,744 | 4,131 (2.6×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 5.5% | ▼ 2.9% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 596.8M | 405M | 191.7M |
| Visits (24h) | 168.5K | 489.5K | 321.1K (2.9×) |
| Visits (7d) | 281.1K | 1.3M | 985.4K (4.5×) |
| Favorites | 1.3M | 10.9M | 9.6M (8.4×) |
| Rating | 91.7% | 96.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #803 | #325 | of 4,381 |
| Trending score | 5.2 | -11.6 | — |
| Created | Mar 17, 2019 | Feb 12, 2021 | — |
| Genre | Roleplay & Avatar Sim | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Forgotten Worlds vs Sintonia RPForgotten Worlds vs Prove You Are Not a Dum-DumForgotten Worlds vs Logo for Brainrots!Forgotten Worlds vs [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 CommanderForgotten Worlds vs [CUSTOM SERVERS] Sing It! Karaoke Battles [VC]Forgotten Worlds vs Nullscape [DOOM IN BLOOM]Compare two other games →
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for Forgotten Worlds, 4 for Build to Survive.