Build to Survive vs [PILLAR CHASE UPD] HUNTED
Build to Survive currently leads with 4,837 concurrent players against 1,114, a 4.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 2,624. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (405M vs 143.7M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive and [PILLAR CHASE UPD] HUNTED is charted above.
Build to Survive 🛠️
4,837
playing now
6,607 24h peak · 405M visits
VS
[PILLAR CHASE UPD] HUNTED
1,114
playing now
2,624 24h peak · 143.7M visits
Player count history
Build to Survive[PILLAR CHASE UPD] HUNTED
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive | [PILLAR CHASE UPD] HUNTED | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,837 | 1,114 | 3,723 (4.3×) |
| 24h peak | 6,607 | 2,624 | 3,983 (2.5×) |
| 24h average | 4,924 | 1,500 | 3,424 (3.3×) |
| 7-day peak | 6,744 | 2,624 | 4,120 (2.6×) |
| 7-day average | 5,179 | 1,345 | 3,834 (3.9×) |
| 30-day peak | 6,744 | 2,624 | 4,120 (2.6×) |
| All-time peak | 6,744 | 2,624 | 4,120 (2.6×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 4.5% | ▲ 21.4% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 405M | 143.7M | 261.3M (2.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 489.7K | 385K | 104.7K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.2M | 636.2K | 612.4K (2.0×) |
| Favorites | 10.9M | 753.3K | 10.1M (14.4×) |
| Rating | 96.2% | 84.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #332 | #1,220 | of 4,381 |
| Trending score | -18.1 | 36.0 | — |
| Created | Feb 12, 2021 | Feb 11, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Build to Survive, 3 for [PILLAR CHASE UPD] HUNTED.