Animal Simulator vs [ASCENSION]+1 Shrink per Step

[ASCENSION]+1 Shrink per Step currently leads with 5,273 concurrent players against 3,949. On all-time peak the record belongs to [ASCENSION]+1 Shrink per Step at 6,733 concurrent players, versus 4,853. Lifetime, Animal Simulator has more visits (1.6B vs 91.1M). Full side-by-side history for Animal Simulator and [ASCENSION]+1 Shrink per Step is charted above.

Animal Simulator
3,949
playing now
4,853 24h peak Β· 1.6B visits
VS
[ASCENSIONπŸ’«]+1 Shrink per Step
5,273
playing now
6,733 24h peak Β· 91.1M visits

Player count history

Animal Simulator[ASCENSION]+1 Shrink per Step

Head to head

Metric Animal Simulator [ASCENSION]+1 Shrink per StepDifference
Playing now3,9495,2731,324
24h peak4,8536,7331,880
24h average3,9915,1811,190
7-day peak4,8536,7331,880
7-day average3,5904,053463
30-day peak4,8536,7331,880
All-time peak4,8536,7331,880
24h changeβ–² 4.0%β–² 10.3%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits1.6B91.1M1.5B (17.2Γ—)
Visits (24h)325.3K575.8K250.4K (1.8Γ—)
Visits (7d)1.1M1.9M773.5K (1.7Γ—)
Favorites1.8M3.1M1.3M (1.7Γ—)
Rating83.6%96.1%β€”
Global rank (players)#382#291of 4,425
Trending score40.0102.8β€”
CreatedSep 20, 2020Apr 9, 2026β€”
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for Animal Simulator, 5 for [ASCENSION]+1 Shrink per Step.

Animal Simulator vs [ASCENSION]+1 Shrink per Step β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals