Animal Simulator vs Build to Survive
Build to Survive currently leads with 5,186 concurrent players against 3,949. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,744 concurrent players, versus 4,853. Lifetime, Animal Simulator has more visits (1.6B vs 405.2M). Full side-by-side history for Animal Simulator and Build to Survive is charted above.
Animal Simulator
3,949
playing now
4,853 24h peak · 1.6B visits
VS
Build to Survive 🛠️
5,186
playing now
6,607 24h peak · 405.2M visits
Player count history
Animal SimulatorBuild to Survive
Head to head
| Metric | Animal Simulator | Build to Survive | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 3,949 | 5,186 | 1,237 |
| 24h peak | 4,853 | 6,607 | 1,754 |
| 24h average | 3,991 | 5,337 | 1,346 |
| 7-day peak | 4,853 | 6,744 | 1,891 |
| 7-day average | 3,590 | 5,238 | 1,648 |
| 30-day peak | 4,853 | 6,744 | 1,891 |
| All-time peak | 4,853 | 6,744 | 1,891 |
| 24h change | ▲ 4.0% | ▼ 4.6% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 1.6B | 405.2M | 1.2B (3.9×) |
| Visits (24h) | 325.3K | 504.2K | 178.9K (1.6×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.1M | 1.4M | 303.3K |
| Favorites | 1.8M | 10.9M | 9M (6.0×) |
| Rating | 83.6% | 96.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #382 | #300 | of 4,425 |
| Trending score | 40.0 | 7.0 | — |
| Created | Sep 20, 2020 | Feb 12, 2021 | — |
| Genre | Roleplay & Avatar Sim | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Animal Simulator, 4 for Build to Survive.