Animal Simulator vs [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander

[Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander currently leads with 5,625 concurrent players against 3,867. On all-time peak the record belongs to [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander at 6,746 concurrent players, versus 4,853. Lifetime, Animal Simulator has more visits (1.6B vs 22.4M). Full side-by-side history for Animal Simulator and [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander is charted above.

Animal Simulator
3,867
playing now
4,853 24h peak · 1.6B visits
VS
[Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander
5,625
playing now
6,480 24h peak · 22.4M visits

Player count history

Animal Simulator[Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander

Head to head

Metric Animal Simulator [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 CommanderDifference
Playing now3,8675,6251,758
24h peak4,8536,4801,627
24h average3,9445,0751,131
7-day peak4,8536,7461,893
7-day average3,5804,8871,307
30-day peak4,8536,7461,893
All-time peak4,8536,7461,893
24h change 4.4% 0.5%
7d change
Total visits1.6B22.4M1.5B (70.0×)
Visits (24h)325.3K531.7K206.4K (1.6×)
Visits (7d)1.1M2M884.4K (1.8×)
Favorites1.8M85.1K1.7M (21.3×)
Rating83.6%95.1%
Global rank (players)#391#272of 4,425
Trending score36.314.2
CreatedSep 20, 2020Jun 10, 2026
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Animal Simulator, 5 for [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander.

Animal Simulator vs [Fixed 1.5.6] WW3 Commander — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals