RIOTFALL [FPS] vs Would You Rather: Age Tower
Would You Rather: Age Tower currently leads with 1,940 concurrent players against 275, a 7.1× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to RIOTFALL [FPS] at 4,039 concurrent players, versus 3,431. Lifetime, Would You Rather: Age Tower has more visits (65M vs 33.4M). Full side-by-side history for RIOTFALL [FPS] and Would You Rather: Age Tower is charted above.
RIOTFALL [FPS]
275
playing now
567 24h peak · 33.4M visits
VS
Would You Rather: Age Tower 👶
1,940
playing now
2,224 24h peak · 65M visits
Player count history
RIOTFALL [FPS]Would You Rather: Age Tower
Head to head
| Metric | RIOTFALL [FPS] | Would You Rather: Age Tower | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 275 | 1,940 | 1,665 (7.1×) |
| 24h peak | 567 | 2,224 | 1,657 (3.9×) |
| 24h average | 349 | 1,867 | 1,518 (5.3×) |
| 7-day peak | 3,981 | 3,409 | 572 |
| 7-day average | 1,411 | 2,100 | 689 |
| 30-day peak | 3,981 | 3,409 | 572 |
| All-time peak | 4,039 | 3,431 | 608 |
| 24h change | ▼ 87.7% | ▲ 0.4% | — |
| 7d change | — | ▲ 39.0% | — |
| Total visits | 33.4M | 65M | 31.6M (1.9×) |
| Visits (24h) | 70.3K | 375K | 304.7K (5.3×) |
| Visits (7d) | 734.1K | 3.5M | 2.7M (4.7×) |
| Favorites | 417.6K | 184.2K | 233.4K (2.3×) |
| Rating | 83.7% | 69.6% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,537 | #774 | of 7,126 |
| Trending score | -189.0 | -35.9 | — |
| Created | Oct 21, 2021 | May 19, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Shooter | Obby & Platformer | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 2 days for RIOTFALL [FPS], 10 for Would You Rather: Age Tower.