Horrific Housing vs RIOTFALL [FPS]
Horrific Housing currently leads with 2,565 concurrent players against 275, a 9.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Horrific Housing at 4,143 concurrent players, versus 4,039. Lifetime, Horrific Housing has more visits (715M vs 33.4M). Full side-by-side history for Horrific Housing and RIOTFALL [FPS] is charted above.
Horrific Housing
2,565
playing now
2,889 24h peak · 715M visits
VS
RIOTFALL [FPS]
275
playing now
567 24h peak · 33.4M visits
Player count history
Horrific HousingRIOTFALL [FPS]
Head to head
| Metric | Horrific Housing | RIOTFALL [FPS] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,565 | 275 | 2,290 (9.3×) |
| 24h peak | 2,889 | 567 | 2,322 (5.1×) |
| 24h average | 2,287 | 349 | 1,938 (6.6×) |
| 7-day peak | 3,407 | 3,981 | 574 |
| 7-day average | 2,277 | 1,411 | 866 (1.6×) |
| 30-day peak | 4,143 | 3,981 | 162 |
| All-time peak | 4,143 | 4,039 | 104 |
| 24h change | ▲ 9.6% | ▼ 87.7% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 16.3% | — | — |
| Total visits | 715M | 33.4M | 681.6M (21.4×) |
| Visits (24h) | 205.9K | 70.3K | 135.6K (2.9×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.6M | 734.1K | 888K (2.2×) |
| Favorites | 2M | 417.6K | 1.6M (4.7×) |
| Rating | 78.2% | 83.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #585 | #2,537 | of 7,126 |
| Trending score | 1.5 | -189.0 | — |
| Created | Jun 27, 2015 | Oct 21, 2021 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Shooter | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for Horrific Housing, 2 for RIOTFALL [FPS].