Horrific Housing vs AIMBOT [FPS]

AIMBOT [FPS] currently leads with 2,816 concurrent players against 2,308. On all-time peak the record belongs to Horrific Housing at 4,143 concurrent players, versus 4,082. Lifetime, Horrific Housing has more visits (715M vs 3.3M). Full side-by-side history for Horrific Housing and AIMBOT [FPS] is charted above.

Horrific Housing
2,308
playing now
2,889 24h peak Β· 715M visits
VS
πŸ’’ AIMBOT [FPS]
2,816
playing now
3,777 24h peak Β· 3.3M visits

Player count history

Horrific HousingAIMBOT [FPS]

Head to head

Metric Horrific Housing AIMBOT [FPS]Difference
Playing now2,3082,816508
24h peak2,8893,777888
24h average2,2432,735492
7-day peak3,4073,970563
7-day average2,2662,28923
30-day peak4,1433,970173
All-time peak4,1434,08261
24h changeβ–² 6.8%β–² 26.9%β€”
7d changeβ–Ό 16.7%β€”β€”
Total visits715M3.3M711.7M (215.9Γ—)
Visits (24h)205.8K761.1K555.3K (3.7Γ—)
Visits (7d)1.6M2.8M1.2M (1.7Γ—)
Favorites2M98.5K1.9M (20.0Γ—)
Rating78.2%94.7%β€”
Global rank (players)#628#541of 7,126
Trending score-3.466.3β€”
CreatedJun 27, 2015Nov 20, 2025β€”
GenreSurvivalShooterβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 10 days for Horrific Housing, 5 for AIMBOT [FPS].

Horrific Housing vs AIMBOT [FPS] β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals