Horrific Housing vs MOUNT RNG

MOUNT RNG currently leads with 3,082 concurrent players against 2,308. On all-time peak the record belongs to Horrific Housing at 4,143 concurrent players, versus 4,021. Momentum favours MOUNT RNG: +38.8% week over week versus -16.7% for Horrific Housing. Lifetime, Horrific Housing has more visits (715M vs 69.8M). Full side-by-side history for Horrific Housing and MOUNT RNG is charted above.

Horrific Housing
2,308
playing now
2,889 24h peak Β· 715M visits
VS
[🐲] MOUNT RNG
3,082
playing now
3,830 24h peak Β· 69.8M visits

Player count history

Horrific HousingMOUNT RNG

Head to head

Metric Horrific Housing MOUNT RNGDifference
Playing now2,3083,082774
24h peak2,8893,830941
24h average2,2433,185942
7-day peak3,4073,968561
7-day average2,2662,745479
30-day peak4,1433,968175
All-time peak4,1434,021122
24h changeβ–² 6.8%β–Ό 4.7%β€”
7d changeβ–Ό 16.7%β–² 38.8%β€”
Total visits715M69.8M645.2M (10.2Γ—)
Visits (24h)205.8K219.1K13.4K
Visits (7d)1.6M1.3M299.8K
Favorites2M131.7K1.8M (15.0Γ—)
Rating78.2%95.5%β€”
Global rank (players)#628#494of 7,126
Trending score-3.455.7β€”
CreatedJun 27, 2015Aug 25, 2024β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 10 days for Horrific Housing, 10 for MOUNT RNG.

Horrific Housing vs MOUNT RNG β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals