RIOTFALL [FPS] vs MOUNT RNG
MOUNT RNG currently leads with 3,205 concurrent players against 361, a 8.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to RIOTFALL [FPS] at 4,039 concurrent players, versus 4,021. Lifetime, MOUNT RNG has more visits (69.8M vs 33.4M). Full side-by-side history for RIOTFALL [FPS] and MOUNT RNG is charted above.
RIOTFALL [FPS]
361
playing now
773 24h peak · 33.4M visits
VS
[🐲] MOUNT RNG
3,205
playing now
3,830 24h peak · 69.8M visits
Player count history
RIOTFALL [FPS]MOUNT RNG
Head to head
| Metric | RIOTFALL [FPS] | MOUNT RNG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 361 | 3,205 | 2,844 (8.9×) |
| 24h peak | 773 | 3,830 | 3,057 (5.0×) |
| 24h average | 379 | 3,252 | 2,873 (8.6×) |
| 7-day peak | 3,981 | 3,968 | 13 |
| 7-day average | 1,461 | 2,737 | 1,276 (1.9×) |
| 30-day peak | 3,981 | 3,968 | 13 |
| All-time peak | 4,039 | 4,021 | 18 |
| 24h change | ▼ 87.5% | ▼ 2.2% | — |
| 7d change | — | ▲ 38.2% | — |
| Total visits | 33.4M | 69.8M | 36.4M (2.1×) |
| Visits (24h) | 73.9K | 217.5K | 143.6K (2.9×) |
| Visits (7d) | 728.5K | 1.3M | 579.8K (1.8×) |
| Favorites | 417.6K | 131.6K | 285.9K (3.2×) |
| Rating | 83.7% | 95.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,325 | #524 | of 7,127 |
| Trending score | -188.6 | 65.5 | — |
| Created | Oct 21, 2021 | Aug 25, 2024 | — |
| Genre | Shooter | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 2 days for RIOTFALL [FPS], 10 for MOUNT RNG.