Build to Survive [TESTING] vs BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 3,917 concurrent players against 3,115. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 4,261. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +3.8% week over week versus -3.9% for BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.9M vs 35.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
3,917
playing now
6,794 24h peak Β· 268.9M visits
VS
BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE
3,115
playing now
4,261 24h peak Β· 35.1M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVEDifference
Playing now3,9173,115802
24h peak6,7944,2612,533 (1.6Γ—)
24h average4,9413,4211,520
7-day peak6,7944,2612,533 (1.6Γ—)
7-day average4,9492,9991,950 (1.7Γ—)
30-day peak6,7944,2612,533 (1.6Γ—)
All-time peak7,7294,2613,468 (1.8Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 0.4%β–² 15.1%β€”
7d changeβ–² 3.8%β–Ό 3.9%β€”
Total visits268.9M35.1M233.8M (7.7Γ—)
Visits (24h)472.1K284.4K187.7K (1.7Γ—)
Visits (7d)3.2M1.8M1.4M (1.8Γ—)
Favorites5.6M49.7K5.6M (112.9Γ—)
Rating96.5%81.4%β€”
Global rank (players)#362#463of 8,339
Trending score-0.649.3β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021May 10, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSurvivalβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 13 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 13 for BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE.