Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [ENDLESS] Drain the Lake

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 5,040 concurrent players against 3,586. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 6,811. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +12.3% week over week versus -20.6% for [ENDLESS] Drain the Lake. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.4M vs 135.8M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and [ENDLESS] Drain the Lake is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
5,040
playing now
6,297 24h peak Β· 268.4M visits
VS
[ENDLESS] Drain the Lake
3,586
playing now
6,811 24h peak Β· 135.8M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING][ENDLESS] Drain the Lake

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] [ENDLESS] Drain the LakeDifference
Playing now5,0403,5861,454
24h peak6,2976,811514
24h average4,9024,521381
7-day peak7,5576,811746
7-day average5,1353,4181,717 (1.5Γ—)
30-day peak7,5576,811746
All-time peak7,7296,811918
24h changeβ–Ό 2.2%β–² 58.0%β€”
7d changeβ–² 12.3%β–Ό 20.6%β€”
Total visits268.4M135.8M132.6M (2.0Γ—)
Visits (24h)430.3K481.3K51K
Visits (7d)3.3M2.4M867.1K
Favorites5.6M389.4K5.2M (14.4Γ—)
Rating96.5%95.8%β€”
Global rank (players)#376#528of 7,928
Trending score-16.7117.1β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jun 3, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 12 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 13 for [ENDLESS] Drain the Lake.