Build to Survive [TESTING] vs [UPD] ZOO or OOF 2

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,989 concurrent players against 4,620. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 6,805. Momentum favours [UPD] ZOO or OOF 2: +135.1% week over week versus +12.4% for Build to Survive [TESTING]. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.4M vs 3.7M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and [UPD] ZOO or OOF 2 is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,989
playing now
6,297 24h peak Β· 268.4M visits
VS
[UPD] ZOO or OOF 2πŸ’₯
4,620
playing now
6,805 24h peak Β· 3.7M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING][UPD] ZOO or OOF 2

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] [UPD] ZOO or OOF 2Difference
Playing now4,9894,620369
24h peak6,2976,805508
24h average4,9925,09199
7-day peak7,5576,805752
7-day average5,1472,9392,208 (1.8Γ—)
30-day peak7,5576,805752
All-time peak7,7296,805924
24h changeβ–Ό 0.8%β–² 74.1%β€”
7d changeβ–² 12.4%β–² 135.1%β€”
Total visits268.4M3.7M264.7M (72.6Γ—)
Visits (24h)430.6K553.9K123.3K
Visits (7d)3.3M2.2M1.1M
Favorites5.6M11.8K5.6M (475.6Γ—)
Rating96.5%84.1%β€”
Global rank (players)#351#392of 7,929
Trending score-11.1269.2β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jul 27, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalParty & Casualβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 12 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for [UPD] ZOO or OOF 2.