Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Homer Nightmares [HORROR]

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,150 concurrent players against 4,123. On all-time peak the record belongs to Homer Nightmares [HORROR] at 10,890 concurrent players, versus 7,729. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +12.0% week over week versus -46.5% for Homer Nightmares [HORROR]. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.4M vs 10.3M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Homer Nightmares [HORROR] is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,150
playing now
6,297 24h peak Β· 268.4M visits
VS
Homer Nightmares [HORROR]
4,123
playing now
4,530 24h peak Β· 10.3M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Homer Nightmares [HORROR]

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Homer Nightmares [HORROR]Difference
Playing now4,1504,12327
24h peak6,2974,5301,767
24h average4,7393,5021,237
7-day peak7,5577,278279
7-day average5,1103,3681,742 (1.5Γ—)
30-day peak7,55710,8903,333
All-time peak7,72910,8903,161
24h changeβ–Ό 4.5%β–² 40.7%β€”
7d changeβ–² 12.0%β–Ό 46.5%β€”
Total visits268.4M10.3M258M (26.0Γ—)
Visits (24h)436K460.2K24.2K
Visits (7d)3.3M3.5M250.8K
Favorites5.6M671.2K4.9M (8.3Γ—)
Rating96.5%79.9%β€”
Global rank (players)#382#389of 7,866
Trending score-26.614.0β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Jun 15, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalAdventureβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for Homer Nightmares [HORROR].