Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha]

Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha] currently leads with 4,322 concurrent players against 4,219. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 7,292. Momentum favours Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha]: +34.1% week over week versus +11.7% for Build to Survive [TESTING]. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.4M vs 55.6M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha] is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,219
playing now
6,297 24h peak Β· 268.4M visits
VS
Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha]
4,322
playing now
7,292 24h peak Β· 55.6M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha]

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha]Difference
Playing now4,2194,322103
24h peak6,2977,292995
24h average4,6665,039373
7-day peak7,5577,292265
7-day average5,0974,227870
30-day peak7,5577,292265
All-time peak7,7297,292437
24h changeβ–Ό 6.0%β–Ό 2.2%β€”
7d changeβ–² 11.7%β–² 34.1%β€”
Total visits268.4M55.6M212.7M (4.8Γ—)
Visits (24h)431.1K646.6K215.5K
Visits (7d)3.3M3.7M408.4K
Favorites5.6M163.8K5.4M (34.2Γ—)
Rating96.5%74.8%β€”
Global rank (players)#392#383of 7,866
Trending score-30.970.7β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021May 30, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSurvivalβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 11 for Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha].