Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Villa Tycoon

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,761 concurrent players against 2,363, a 2.0Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 2,363. Momentum favours Villa Tycoon: +124.9% week over week versus +16.0% for Build to Survive [TESTING]. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268M vs 14.8M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Villa Tycoon is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,761
playing now
6,224 24h peak Β· 268M visits
VS
[🏑] Villa Tycoon
2,363
playing now
2,363 24h peak Β· 14.8M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Villa Tycoon

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Villa TycoonDifference
Playing now4,7612,3632,398 (2.0Γ—)
24h peak6,2242,3633,861 (2.6Γ—)
24h average4,8931,6523,241 (3.0Γ—)
7-day peak7,5572,3635,194 (3.2Γ—)
7-day average5,1791,0734,106 (4.8Γ—)
30-day peak7,5572,3635,194 (3.2Γ—)
All-time peak7,7292,3635,366 (3.3Γ—)
24h changeβ–Ό 4.3%β–² 17.2%β€”
7d changeβ–² 16.0%β–² 124.9%β€”
Total visits268M14.8M253.2M (18.1Γ—)
Visits (24h)425.5K133.3K292.2K (3.2Γ—)
Visits (7d)3.3M641.6K2.7M (5.2Γ—)
Favorites5.6M45.8K5.5M (122.0Γ—)
Rating96.5%93.4%β€”
Global rank (players)#348#751of 7,662
Trending score-20.3169.8β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Mar 5, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for Villa Tycoon.

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Villa Tycoon β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals