Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Deadly Heist

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,243 concurrent players against 904, a 4.7Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 6,072 concurrent players, versus 2,150. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (264.6M vs 106.1M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Deadly Heist is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,243
playing now
6,072 24h peak Β· 264.6M visits
VS
πŸ’° Deadly Heist πŸ’°
904
playing now
1,632 24h peak Β· 106.1M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Deadly Heist

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Deadly HeistDifference
Playing now4,2439043,339 (4.7Γ—)
24h peak6,0721,6324,440 (3.7Γ—)
24h average4,5661,2063,360 (3.8Γ—)
7-day peak6,0722,1383,934 (2.8Γ—)
7-day average4,4261,3083,118 (3.4Γ—)
30-day peak6,0722,1383,934 (2.8Γ—)
All-time peak6,0722,1503,922 (2.8Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 8.9%β–Ό 22.2%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits264.6M106.1M158.5M (2.5Γ—)
Visits (24h)404.4K208.5K195.8K (1.9Γ—)
Visits (7d)1M376K638.8K (2.7Γ—)
Favorites5.5M786.9K4.7M (7.0Γ—)
Rating96.5%87.7%β€”
Global rank (players)#399#1,305of 4,381
Trending score11.5-23.6β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Mar 15, 2025β€”
GenreSurvivalAdventureβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 4 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 3 for Deadly Heist.

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Deadly Heist β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals