Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Eternal Towers of Hell
Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,851 concurrent players against 1,512, a 3.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 2,373. Momentum favours Build to Survive [TESTING]: +16.2% week over week versus +0.4% for Eternal Towers of Hell. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268M vs 115.8M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Eternal Towers of Hell is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | Build to Survive [TESTING] | Eternal Towers of Hell | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 4,851 | 1,512 | 3,339 (3.2×) |
| 24h peak | 6,224 | 2,154 | 4,070 (2.9×) |
| 24h average | 4,919 | 1,542 | 3,377 (3.2×) |
| 7-day peak | 7,557 | 2,366 | 5,191 (3.2×) |
| 7-day average | 5,186 | 1,605 | 3,581 (3.2×) |
| 30-day peak | 7,557 | 2,366 | 5,191 (3.2×) |
| All-time peak | 7,729 | 2,373 | 5,356 (3.3×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 4.0% | ▲ 0.0% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 16.2% | ▲ 0.4% | — |
| Total visits | 268M | 115.8M | 152.2M (2.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 425.2K | 117.7K | 307.6K (3.6×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.3M | 873.8K | 2.5M (3.8×) |
| Favorites | 5.6M | 189.5K | 5.4M (29.5×) |
| Rating | 96.5% | 79.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #356 | #1,066 | of 7,662 |
| Trending score | -18.9 | -12.3 | — |
| Created | Aug 12, 2021 | Jan 17, 2022 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Obby & Platformer | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 12 for Eternal Towers of Hell.