Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Breakfast House RP

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,363 concurrent players against 2,191, a 2.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 4,250. Momentum favours Breakfast House RP: +69.3% week over week versus +4.2% for Build to Survive [TESTING]. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (268.9M vs 12.5M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Breakfast House RP is charted above.

Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
4,363
playing now
6,794 24h peak · 268.9M visits
VS
Breakfast House 🔥 RP
2,191
playing now
3,001 24h peak · 12.5M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Breakfast House RP

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Breakfast House RPDifference
Playing now4,3632,1912,172 (2.0×)
24h peak6,7943,0013,793 (2.3×)
24h average5,0272,3192,708 (2.2×)
7-day peak6,7944,2502,544 (1.6×)
7-day average4,9662,0812,885 (2.4×)
30-day peak6,7944,2502,544 (1.6×)
All-time peak7,7294,2503,479 (1.8×)
24h change 2.3% 24.8%
7d change 4.2% 69.3%
Total visits268.9M12.5M256.4M (21.5×)
Visits (24h)472.3K267.8K204.5K (1.8×)
Visits (7d)3.2M1.7M1.5M (1.9×)
Favorites5.6M95.6K5.5M (58.7×)
Rating96.5%91.0%
Global rank (players)#344#718of 8,339
Trending score4.538.0
CreatedAug 12, 2021Dec 7, 2025
GenreSurvivalRoleplay & Avatar Sim

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 14 for Breakfast House RP.