Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Chainsaw Man Testing Place

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 4,476 concurrent players against 1,883, a 2.4Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 1,931. Lifetime, Build to Survive [TESTING] has more visits (267.9M vs 156.9M). Full side-by-side history for Build to Survive [TESTING] and Chainsaw Man Testing Place is charted above.

Build to Survive πŸ› οΈ [TESTING]
4,476
playing now
6,224 24h peak Β· 267.9M visits
VS
Chainsaw Man Testing Place
1,883
playing now
1,931 24h peak Β· 156.9M visits

Player count history

Build to Survive [TESTING]Chainsaw Man Testing Place

Head to head

Metric Build to Survive [TESTING] Chainsaw Man Testing PlaceDifference
Playing now4,4761,8832,593 (2.4Γ—)
24h peak6,2241,9314,293 (3.2Γ—)
24h average4,8451,5753,270 (3.1Γ—)
7-day peak7,5571,9315,626 (3.9Γ—)
7-day average5,1681,3623,806 (3.8Γ—)
30-day peak7,5571,9315,626 (3.9Γ—)
All-time peak7,7291,9315,798 (4.0Γ—)
24h changeβ–Ό 5.6%β–² 41.8%β€”
7d changeβ–² 15.7%β€”β€”
Total visits267.9M156.9M111M (1.7Γ—)
Visits (24h)421.1K161.8K259.3K (2.6Γ—)
Visits (7d)3.3M372.3K3M (9.0Γ—)
Favorites5.6M144.4K5.4M (38.7Γ—)
Rating96.5%73.2%β€”
Global rank (players)#358#845of 7,460
Trending score-22.949.1β€”
CreatedAug 12, 2021Oct 21, 2022β€”
GenreSurvivalActionβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 10 days for Build to Survive [TESTING], 3 for Chainsaw Man Testing Place.

Build to Survive [TESTING] vs Chainsaw Man Testing Place β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals